• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MAT-CS - Materials Characterization Services

Materials Characterization Services

  • Home
  • About
    • Meet the Team
    • Consulting
  • Analytical Techniques
    • Bulk Analysis
    • Microscopy and Microanalytical
    • Surface and Thin Film
    • Polymer Characterization
    • Optical Measurements
    • Liquids and Gases
    • Electrical / Electronics
    • Reliability Testing
    • Miscellaneous
  • Test Methods
    • ASTM Methods List
    • ISO Methods List
    • AATCC
    • AOAC
    • AOCS
    • EPA, SM
    • FDA BAM
    • IP
    • JEDEC
    • MIL-STD
    • OCSPP
    • OPPTS
    • REACH
    • RoHS
    • SEMI
    • TAPPI
    • USP/EP/JP
  • Resources
    • Experiment Design
    • Consulting
    • The Laboratory Landscape
    • Quality Programs
    • Regulatory-Based Analyses
  • Contact Us
  • Get a Quote!
MAT-CS Home Cover

ASTM A262

ASTM A262 – Standard Practices for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels

Description:

Significance and Use

6.1 Use of the etch test allows rapid acceptance of specific lots of material without the need to perform time-consuming and costly hot acid immersion tests on those lots.

Abstract

This specification covers the standard practices for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic stainless steels. These practices include five intergranular corrosion tests, namely: (1) oxalic acid etch test for classification of etch structures of austenitic stainless steels; (2) ferric sulfate-sulfuric acid test, (3) nitric acid test and (4) copper-copper sulfate-sulfuric acid test for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic stainless steels; and (5) copper-copper sulfate-50% sulfuric acid test for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in molybdenum-bearing cast austenitic stainless steels. Methods for preparing the test specimens, rapid screening tests, apparatus setup and testing procedures, and calculations and report contents are described for each testing practice. The etch structure types used to classify the specimens are: step structure, dual structure, ditch structure, isolated ferrite, interdendritic ditches, end-grain pitting I, and end-grain pitting II.

Scope

1.1 These practices cover the following five tests:

1.1.1 Practice A—Oxalic Acid Etch Test for Classification of Etch Structures of Austenitic Stainless Steels (Sections 4 to 13, inclusive),

1.1.2 Practice B—Ferric Sulfate-Sulfuric Acid Test for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels (Sections 14 to 25, inclusive),

1.1.3 Practice C—Nitric Acid Test for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels (Sections 26 to 36, inclusive),

1.1.4 Practice E—Copper–Copper Sulfate–Sulfuric Acid Test for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels (Sections 37 to 46, inclusive), and

1.1.5 Practice F—Copper–Copper Sulfate–50 % Sulfuric Acid Test for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Molybdenum-Bearing Austenitic Stainless Steels (Sections 47 to 58, inclusive).

1.2 The Oxalic Acid Etch Test is a rapid method of identifying, by simple etching, those specimens of certain stainless steel grades that are essentially free of susceptibility to intergranular attack associated with chromium carbide precipitates. These specimens will have low corrosion rates in certain corrosion tests and therefore can be eliminated (screened) from testing as “acceptable.” The etch test is applicable only to those grades listed in the individual hot acid tests and classifies the specimens either as “acceptable” or as “suspect.”

1.3 The ferric sulfate-sulfuric acid test, the copper–copper sulfate–50 % sulfuric acid test, and the nitric acid test are based on weight loss determinations and, thus, provide a quantitative measure of the relative performance of specimens evaluated. In contrast, the copper–copper sulfate–16 % sulfuric acid test is based on visual examination of bend specimens and, therefore, classifies the specimens only as acceptable or nonacceptable.

1.4 The presence or absence of intergranular attack in these tests is not necessarily a measure of the performance of the material in other corrosive environments. These tests do not provide a basis for predicting resistance to forms of corrosion other than intergranular, such as general corrosion, pitting, or stress-corrosion cracking.

NOTE 1: See Appendix X1 for information regarding test selection.

1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The inch-pound equivalents are in parentheses and may be approximate.

Related Test Methods

ASTM D5208

ASTM D5206

ASTM D5201

ASTM D5200

ASTM D5199

ASTM D5198

ASTM D5194

ASTM D5191

ASTM D5190

ASTM D5188

ASTM D5187

ASTM D5186

Previous Post:MAT-CS Home CoverASTM A255
Next Post:ASTM A275MAT-CS Home Cover

Ready to start your analysis?

Get a Quote!
MAT-CS

Your One Source for Materials Analysis

1-800-685-2088

support@mat-cs.com

  • Home
  • Analytical Techniques
  • Test Methods
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Get a Quote!
  • Special Analysis Request

  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2026 Materials Characterization Services · A member of the Covalent Group. · All Rights Reserved